Wednesday, March 23, 2011

The Depression-Inducing Portrait

Thomas Gainsborough, The Honourable Mrs. Graham, 1775-7
Georgiana and her best friend Mary Graham had many things in common.  One of their commonalities is they were lucky enough to sit for Thomas Gainsborough more than once.  Their portraits by Gainsborough were highly praised during their lifetime yet both portraits were hidden away from eyes for many years after the sitter's death, to only be narrowly saved and revealed in the following century. 

Like many great paintings, elements of mystery surround Mary's portrait.  She sat for the portrait when she returned from her honeymoon.  Many accounts do not refer to Mary showing the symptoms of tuberculosis, the disease which would plague and kill her and her family, yet she was reportedly too weak to sit long for Gainsborough.  Mary is shown wearing an ornate masquerade dress of pink and silver in the Van Dyck style. A jaunty plumed hat is perched on Mary's high tower of hair.  The fantastic outfit dazzled viewers and was made even more impressive by the fact that it was purely a figment of Gainsborough's imagination.  Mary never owned the dress and supposedly her family was upset with her being portrayed in such a harlot-y sort of outfit.  Strangely I have never personally found any thoughts Mary or her husband, Thomas had on the painting which was raved about when it was exhibited at the Royal Academy.

Mary succumbed to consumption in 1792 leaving a devastated husband wrought with grief.  Thomas could not even bring himself to return to the homes he once shared with his wife.  You might imagine the effect that seeing the celebrated portrait would have on him.  Some accounts say that bricks were laid over the hanging portrait where it remained until it was found during renovations.  Most accounts tell of Thomas hiding it in storage in London.  Storage is where it remained until after Thomas' death.

In 1843 Thomas' cousin, Robert Graham received a message about his deceased cousin's paintings still being in the warehouse. He accepting the paintings not even knowing if they were worth the storage fee he had to pay for them.  Robert had the enthusiasm of a child on Christmas morning and intercepted the delivery cart on Dalcrue bridge and immediately began opening the crates of paintings.  Robert felt as if he was seeing a ghost when he drew out Mary's portrait which had been hidden away for fifty years.

In 1859 Robert bequeathed Mary's portrait to the National Gallery of Scotland on the condition that it never leaves the walls of the museum.  He felt that the portrait should never again be housed in darkness and should be regarded as one of Scotland's national treasures.  Visitors to the National Gallery may just feel that way upon being welcomed to museum by the elegant Mary Graham.
Side-Note: There will be a lecture on Thomas Graham at the National Gallery of Scotland on May 17. Details here.

10 comments:

  1. She looks absolutely stunning and it's no wonder that her husband thought the painting too painful a reminder.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very pretty but again, proportions regarding the length of her arms, seems a bit LONG. Did no one study anatomy? Retro

    ReplyDelete
  3. I recently found a badly framed, badly faded print of the upper half of the painting at the Salvation Army. They wanted 5 bucks for it. I love her face, but I didn't get it because it didn't seem worth it--I mean, it was REALLY faded. It looked beige. It's interesting to know that the original had a story just like Georgiana's "hat" portrait.

    ReplyDelete
  4. @Retro, They may have been purposely rendered that way due to the painting being hung up high. Or perhaps Gainsborough just took some artistic license to emphasize Mary's waif-like appearance :)

    @heidilea, I hate when that happens. I found a gorgeous print at a consignment shop like that. When I requested the price they asked waayyy too much for it!

    ReplyDelete
  5. A nerdy art history juxtaposition: This 1902 John Singer Sargent portrait of Winifred, Duchess of Portland just turned up as the FITMuseum's Dress of the Day -- doesn't it have the same fancy-dress feel as Mrs. Grahmn's portrait?

    http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=8374292&id=39075508091

    Check out the vaguely 17th c. lace collar, the draped pearls, even the colors and the classically-inspired column. Makes me wonder if Sargent (or maybe the Duchess) knew of the Gainsborough portrait, or whether it's just one more of those Great Art Minds thinking alike...:)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ooo it does make you wonder! The rediscovery prompted prints to be made and distributed so I think you could be on to something!

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is one of my favorite paintings, but I can't blame Mary's husband for finding it too painful to look at the portrait after his wife's death. The dress makes it sort of fanciful--more like a masquerade dress than a harlot's dress, IMO--but there's so much sweetness, emotion, and beauty in her face. This painting has a lot of personality, kind of the hat portrait. I could see how it would remind Thomas Graham of how much he'd lost and how he'd find it unbearable to look at.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This is one of my favorites. I would love it if i got a call one day asking if i want to pick up some stuff left from one of my ancestors and it turned out to be something like this!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm an artist and you can't just pull a realistic looking costume like that out of the air. All of the folds and pleats look completely natural. She may not have owned it. But it certainly existed and someone posed in it. Most likely her.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I know it's hard to believe, but Gainsborough was a master of fabric and loved painting clothing!

    ReplyDelete